Chaste Bob's Erotica

AUTHOR'S NOTE:  Pictures taken from the Internet. If you can show you own them and want them removed I will do with apologies. This story represents an expose of sorts by the Resistance.

By Chastebob

This mostly anonymous and secretive group of women has been leading us to a totalitarian tyranny the likes of which has never been seen before. A recent article finally named these women and gave tantalizing tidbits of information about their backgrounds. The Resistance has done some more research and you should be shocked to discover what these women have in store for us if they aren’t stopped.

They would have you believe that shunning fame is about modesty, lack of ego and collaboration, but it also masks the histories of the participants, their fringe beliefs and hidden agendas.

Here’s what you should know about the women of the Female Council. 

Sarah Taylor – They would have us believe that she is the de facto leader of the Council, lending it credibility through her long career as an activist for women’s rights. It is unknown just how much she may or may not agree with some of the more extreme plans of other members, but the fact is she hasn’t used any public influence to stop some of the obvious discrimination against males in the new laws.

Ms. Taylor had been one of the voices of reason and fairness in the early days, standing in opposition to the extremists and literal man-haters. In one of those cruel ironies of changing political fortune, it seems she has been co-opted by those very forces she was once successful in beating; while at the same time they advance their policies as if they were fair and reasonable.

We urge Ms. Taylor to come forth publicly and take a stand for reason and fairness, as she has done in the past. Short of diminished faculties (which we certainly hope is not the case) we cannot imagine why this outstanding woman of principle, whom we deeply admire, would allow such blatantly one sided policies to be enacted and rigidly enforced. We seek only equal protection under the law, while acknowledging that women have a special place and require special protection.

Edith Kramer – She’s presented as a Registered Nurse and medical researcher, but her credentials are hard to verify. Saying she worked in the field of human sexuality is like saying the Nazis worked in population control. In the former Soviet Union she was in charge of developing more efficient castration methods, ones that took less time in surgery and recovery; key to her success was the discovery that anesthetic took time. Her work treating what she calls “compulsive masturbation” (which apparently means any) is severe operant conditioning; in other words punishments and rewards. The corollary to quick and efficient castration methods was naturally slow and painful methods that could drag out the process for hours.

Her most recent work on physiological and psychological aspects of orgasm is nothing more or less than the extension of that operant conditioning to a deep level. This work will allow pleasure to be turned to pain, opening the door to a whole new level of torture and mind control. 

Ms. Kramer is already guilty of crimes against humanity and in a just society would be tried and punished for those past and current activities.

Dr. Beatrice Ellsworth – This academic provides an intellectual veneer to cover the Council’s true motives. The esteemed professor has no experience in the world of power politics, and no doubt no knowledge of how her work will actually be interpreted and used. Those who have actually read her doctoral thesis, Evolution of the Male-Female Relationship Dynamic in Post-Industrial Cultures, will find it contains none of the legal or civil restrictions, let alone personal and sexual limitations on men that have been the hallmarks of the Council’s agenda. The thesis is an erudite and well researched paper which, in a nutshell, says that we are moving to work that is more a collection of individual contributors and less like an assembly line where each individual step must be tightly coordinated with all the others. This change makes the old style of management and control, which is a model going back to male hunting parties from our hunter-gatherer past, less effective. Since this type of control has been the social purview of men for roughly 10,000 years it means a big change. Dr. Ellsworth also thinks women’s model for group dynamics is the only thing that comes close to the sort of new approach we will need in this new way of living and working. And that’s all it really says about the roles of men and women, despite what they have led us to believe.

We suspect Dr. Ellsworth is enjoying the kind of notoriety, even just within the Council itself, that academics of her background rarely receive. It must be heady stuff to rub shoulders with the rich and powerful, to be a part of a group that discusses an idea around the table one week and is making such dramatic changes in the world the next. And for that reason we understand her blindness to the Council’s larger agenda. We can only hope that she will come to understand, sooner rather than later, that her work is being used to legitimize oppression. A social scientist, of all people, is in a unique position to understand that repression of such a personal and extensive nature can only lead to the sort of backlash that produces violence; the very sort the Council claims it will end with its edicts.

Mother Superior Mary Katherine – As Dr. Ellsworth does for the Council from a scientific standpoint, Mother Mary Katherine does from a spiritual one. Unlike Dr. Ellsworth, the Sister’s beliefs are compatible with some of the more draconian requirements to come out of the Council. Most women have missed the connection between the anti-sexual nature of her beliefs and the sexual restrictions, possibly because of the one sided-ness of their application. Women should make no mistake, her beliefs in sexual restrictions go way beyond what the Council currently imposes and would extend into very personal aspects of people’s lives. Hint, sex only for reproduction could apply to women as well. Removing the availability of all forms of birth control and outlawing abortions for any reason whatsoever, would only be the starting point. She is well aware that modern technology extends the reach of observation and control.

She has always been guarded about the incident that lead to her becoming a nun, but it wasn’t hard to uncover that it was an instance of sexual abuse by a family member. Rather than seeking solace for herself and forgiveness for her abusers in the Sisterhood, it seems that the Church was an escape and a place to nurture anti-sex and anti-male biases. Her strong support of corporal punishment for women being too lenient with their men might look a lot different if you knew that her mother facilitated her sexual abuse. Although unconfirmed, rumors continue to surface that some women she has punished underwent Female Genital Mutilation. Women who desire to have control over their own sexuality have as much to fear from this member of the Council as do men.

Dana Stewart – The CEO of WOMEN, Inc. is clearly one of the two most powerful women on the Council. It’s easy to see Ms. Stewart’s support of the Council from the standpoint of pursuing power and profit. Why she would care about the sexual restrictions, if in fact she does, is unclear. As for a new style of management, that is less true than her publicist would have us believe. Many of the men working for WOMEN we spoke to (on strict condition of anonymity) said that there was a clear, though unspoken, rule about how high a male could rise in the organization. There are reports of corporal punishments and other disciplinary actions taken against males by some female supervisors. Corporate management dismissed these as a few cases of rogue supervisors who have been dealt with. Though we continue to receive reports of abuse.

To the extent that she does have a new approach to managing the business it appears to use control of sexual energy of her male subordinates to encourage them to better performance as well as harness the energy of their frustration. And this may explain her support for the sexual controls on men in society at large. Where once her company stood out as the only one requiring male chastity of its employees, now that is a “non-issue” since the whole of society is under the same requirements.  

Sgt. Hannah Harmon – Her military credentials are well known, but little else. Apparently no one knows for sure her sexual orientation, although it’s a safe bet that it is dominant in whatever relationship she has. More important than sexual orientation is whether or not she is a man-hater. She gives the impression of being a fanatic willing to follow whatever orders she’s given, at least based on a few interviews we were able to find, but that is admittedly prior to her involvement with the Council. She certainly gives the Council the air of another sort of authority, one not so easily ignored by traditional males. 

There are persistent rumors that she has a clandestine female force in training at a secret location. Although there is no confirmation for that, she certainly has the training to make that happen. More disturbing are the open admission of her interest in interrogation techniques. It doesn’t take much imagination to read “torture” for “interrogation techniques” with this quote from Sgt Harmon herself: “I’ve shown many men that rather than a source of strength and courage, balls are actually a liability. One they have often wished they didn’t have after encountering me.”

Evangeline Nesbit – She is the second of the two most powerful women on the Council. Like Ms. Stewart, money and power motivate Mrs. Nesbit, but that’s not all there is to her. Religious beliefs, together with her public humiliation by her husband’s sexual peccadillos, give her the motivation for the sweeping control over personal sexual activity in the Council’s agenda. She must bear the greatest responsibility for these outrageous invasions of privacy, since they seem to come either directly from her own mind, or indirectly through her inclusion of some fringe voices on the Council. Perhaps it was her own loss of privacy during her husband’s scandal that desensitized her to the loss of privacy her policies would require. Perhaps it was her plan all along to use that to dethrone him. 

The extent to which she was willing to go with regulating personal sexual behavior was there between the lines in her interview quote: “I have always felt that infidelity was a serious sin, whether or not it included another person in the sexual act.” 

Renee Alexander – She has been fairly open about her past as a professional dominatrix. Although she is often portrayed as the redeemed woman, the real Ms. Alexander is less reformed “sinner” than she is sole chief of all sex trade. Any dollar spent in the sex industry contributes its share to her personal fortune, already rumored to rival that of Nesbit and Stuart. Clearly more than official licensing fees are contributing to her income. This is apparently what she meant when she said that the sex industry (if controlled) “can be a useful tool for women.” 

Through her thorough control she has been able to turn most of the workers into private spies, finding men who have been out unlocked. An example of both her business acumen and ruthless desire for domination is found by encouraging all the workers to persuade their single male clients to surrender their keys to them. This ensures repeat business, and extends masturbation control into the single male population. Single males who insist on maintaining their right to their own keys, as long as they are locked in public soon find that it is difficult to find an escort. There is evidence that some of the women publicly punished for leniency with their males were actually freelance sex trade workers, essentially trying to avoid paying off Ms. Alexander.

Karen Babbitt – Everyone knows her as a biased sexual harassment investigator, but few know that it was Renee Alexandra who helped train her to use her assets undercover to expose male sexual harassment. Her techniques would have been called entrapment once upon a time in justice, but those days are gone. 

With the extent of the Council’s control becoming so pervasive in the workplace classic cases of sexual harassment are actually becoming rare. One of the investigative activities she has added is finding unlocked males out in public. Her role playing talents in this regard are legendary. It is unclear who pays her for those investigations as the public bounty is not large. The most rapid area of growth for her business is exposing independent sex workers, presumably for Ms. Alexandra. While these are technically licensing violations, punishable with a fine; many believe Ms. Alexandra pays her for finding situations where a case for leniency with a male under control can be made.

Harriet Sharp – Calling her a rabid man hater doesn’t begin to describe this woman’s attitude. While it is true that little is known about her private or personal life, everyone knows her as the outspoken advocate of castration for sex offenders. However, the Council has done its best to keep secret the full extent of her recommendations and their cruelty. She actually proposed at least 5 different methods of testicle destruction/removal, from a painless surgical procedure all the way up to slow burning without pain killers. She also had a similar number of methods for the penis. This allowed many levels of cruelty for those offenders getting both castration and penectomy. Apparently many options would be needed since so many varied degrees of activities would warrant castration.

Ms. Sharp may have refused to confirm or deny that she was allowed to perform the first legal castration, but we found reliable sources that confirmed not only did she perform the act, but that it was abundantly clear that she derived a great deal of pleasure from it. Some of the witnesses were embarrassed and even a little put off by the obvious glee she expressed during the victim’s agonies. One comment overheard, “I’ve never seen her smile before, but can’t say I’m surprised it’s at this.” 

Martha Williams – Of all the members of the Council she is the most unlikely and easiest to dismiss as a harmless crank or kook. Even so she has managed to attract 2 members (Ms. Sharp, and Ms. Babbitt) to her ideas. Her specific proposals seem certain to go nowhere, though Dr. Ellsworth is interested in the idea of new rituals and cultural rites in a completely changed world; as are Ms. Alexandra and to an extent, Ms. Nesbit. Just as Dr. Ellsworth provides the Council with the appearance of solid intellectual foundations, Ms. Williams will invent the ritual and ceremony that will be the face of the practices the Council does mandate. There is a persistent story that she created a ritual for one of Ms. Sharp’s castration methods, involving a stone altar for crushing the testicles.

Like Dr. Ellsworth, we feel sure that Ms. Williams has never had this sort of high level  attention given to her or her ideas. We can only hope that she will realize that her role in providing the regime with pomp and circumstance is every bit as sinister as those carrying out its cruelest actions. The only sort of harmony the Council will achieve is the locked step of a chain gang; and it won’t only be men enslaved. 

Nancy Pearson – She is one of two “ordinary citizen” members used to create the impression that the Council is in touch with the needs and concerns of the average woman. Her family history (father financially and emotionally hurt the family spending time and money in the sex trade) makes her the natural spokesperson against the sex trade. She’s a lightning rod to ordinary women who share her simplistic thought that the sex trade could be eliminated. Whether or not she knows the whole truth about Ms. Alexandra’s role, she fosters the notion that it is to oversee the sex trade till it can be abolished. 

Despite her naïve belief that the sex business could be eliminated, she has been co-opted by Ms. Alexandra. The chastity laws and informants in the sex trade make it possible to identify the married men and inform their wives. Apparently Mrs. Pearson (and a lot of other “ordinary wives”) liked the idea that they had a powerful ally in controlling their husbands. Some have even used this information to have the professionals deliver discipline that they may be unwilling to deliver themselves. 

Donna Laughlin – The second “ordinary citizen” member of the Council, is single to appeal to the other female demographic. Her personal agenda is about ending “attractiveness-ism”. It’s unclear what, if anything, could come out of such ideas. Ms. Stewart has mollified her somewhat by pledging that all positions at WOMEN Inc. are filled strictly on the basis of merit, and hiring her consulting firm to help ensure a fair and equitable evaluation system. It seems that the new world resembles the old in yet another way.

On a personal note she’s been interested in finding a way to meet men for dating that is both efficient and effective; without becoming the sort of sordid things that “cater to men’s desires”.  We know that Dr. Ellsworth has given the issue some thought as well, but so far there is nothing new to announce. While these ideas probably have about as much chance of seeing action as Ms. Williams’ “back to the wild” de-evolution, there is a risk that some dark version of it might emerge. Imagine what life might be like if profiling were combined with extensive information from Ms. Alexandra’s organization and the business community?

Helen Wheeler – The harsh and hard-nosed Assistant District Attorney for sexually related crimes is the Council’s attorney. While not a member of the Council itself, her legal acumen is behind every “Guideline” the Council issues, as well as proposed litigation and regulation. She is Ms. Sharp’s natural ally in the drive to criminalize more sexual activity with more severe punishments. She is well known as the lawyer who drafted the castration law. While the Council steadily erodes personal liberty on the way to a complete totalitarian dictatorship Ms. Wheeler will make sure that each of our rights were removed with “due process”.

It is our hope that citizens, male and female, will wake up to what is happening and put a stop to it. If everyone would only look beyond the headlines and hype they would see that things are not as they are being presented.